Case · Lead generation · Paid social & search
Same budget. Best lead weeks of the year.
We didn’t increase the ad budget. We moved more of it up the funnel. The campaign period coincided with the three strongest lead weeks in the reporting window.

The journey
Not more budget – a different allocation
01 · The challenge
More leads without a bigger budget
The client ran paid media on Google and Meta, with organic search driving half of all site traffic. The question wasn’t how much to spend, but where in the funnel the money would work hardest.
02 · What we did
Weighting toward Meta top-of-funnel
Total spend held steady, but a larger share went to a Meta campaign optimised for landing page views: low-cost, relevant visits rather than direct conversions.
03 · The result
The three strongest weeks of the year
Weeks 22–24 were the strongest in the reporting window, with average weekly lead volume 63% above the comparison baseline in weeks 22–24, and the best week 76% above it. More than 60% of leads were qualified.
The numbers
Leads rose when top-of-funnel got more room
Source: client lead data, presented as rounded percentage differences. Baseline: average weekly leads in weeks 16–21 and 25–33. When top-of-funnel was later scaled back, average weekly volume in weeks 29–33 was 24% below the comparison baseline.
What we learned
Top-of-funnel isn’t waste – it fills the funnel
Measure top-of-funnel on what it creates
Not last-click leads, but traffic, engagement and the demand that shows up later in search and retargeting.
Reallocate before you increase
The strongest lead weeks coincided with a shift in allocation toward the top of the funnel, without increasing total spend.
Watch for delayed effects
After top-of-funnel activity was scaled back, lead volume declined over time. This pattern suggests a lag worth testing, rather than proving causation.
See every channel in one cockpit
Leads, Meta spend and traffic side by side. Otherwise top-of-funnel looks like waste and gets cut.
The method
Precision Creative Engine
This case is a textbook example of the dual-track principle in our Precision Creative Engine: top-of-funnel and bottom-of-funnel do different jobs and must be measured differently.
We combine an audit-first view of creative and channels with a dedicated test budget and a cockpit dashboard, so decisions are made on the whole funnel – not just last click.
Results were observed over the period and are not from a controlled experiment. A holdout test is the natural next step to isolate the effect.
Is your budget working in the right place?
We’ll review your funnel and show you where your spend works hardest.